![]() ![]() Just don’t care, and then there’s people who are …You’re either A lot of times people aren’t necessarily sophisticated enough or I usually give them a couple of different options. Paranoid that person is and how much they want to protect things. ![]() Phone or something like that.” And you kind of get the sense of how Would be better to, like, meet in person, you know, talk over the You might bring it up and say, “Hey, do you have other apps? Maybe it “Here’s my WeChat, let’s talk.” And so you talk to him a little bit,Īnd then if he’s saying stuff that you’re pretty sure is problematic, ![]() ![]() If is on WeChat, which he probably will be, he’ll say, An American print journalist working in mainland China told us: Journalists noted that the choice of channel for communication with sources can be complex and depends on the source. CRYPTOCAT AUTHOR FOR MEDIA FAST BACKING INSTALLSources may need to download and install additional software, possibly purchase new hardware, learn an interface, and invest considerable time and effort in the process. For sources with low technical skills, encrypted channels may involve onerous work. Journalists told us that, to some less sophisticated sources, the mere mention of encrypted channels can seem like an escalation and may cause the source to lose trust in the journalist or withhold information they may have been willing to provide. But these moves (specifically the latter) can make the source nervous and may reduce their willingness to continue the conversation, especially about sensitive subjects (for sources not already aware of the likely level of surveillance on less secure channels). CRYPTOCAT AUTHOR FOR MEDIA FAST BACKING OFFLINEAlthough there have been more people who turned to Telegram, or even some people turning to CryptoCat, or other encrypted methods, most people stick to WhatsApp for everything.” 52 We found journalists who tried to take a conversation offline to protect sources and data by meeting in person or switching to an encrypted channel. One journalist warned about the risks of reporting with chat apps: “I think people don’t really have a sense of the danger out there, the security issues associated with these apps. Journalists said they must accommodate sources’ varying familiarity with specific apps. Changing features can lead to enhanced or reduced levels of privacy. When reporting with chat apps under conditions of political unrest, savvy journalists familiarized themselves with apps’ privacy and security features, and stayed current with these chat apps’ evolving functionalities. In our interviews, we found that, unlike social networking sites, chat apps provide means for reporters to circumvent government censorship and surveillance. Journalistic Uses of Chat Apps Under Censorship and Surveillance This section explores two important dimensions of private networking that came up in our interviews: the possibility for journalists to gain trust and circumvent censorship, and the emergence of the role of the digital fixer. In a sense, private networking sites such as WeChat or Telegram could transform newsgathering. For example, WeChat is searchable, but many reporters mentioned difficulty accessing certain private groups. Some of the chat apps that we studied in this report have public and private features. While social networking sites have allowed individuals or groups to socialize and intersect with people and content online openly, private networking sites have allowed for the privatization of socialization and online content. Private networking sites refer to sites that allow individuals or groups to leverage knowledge and experiences of people in a network privately. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |